Use of and Access to Deep Sedation and General Anesthesia for Dental Patients: A Survey of Ontario Dentists

July 24, 2017

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aims to assess barriers to the use of deep sedation/general anesthesia (DS/GA) identified by dentists in Ontario.

Methods: An email invitation to a web-based survey was distributed to all licensed dentists and specialists who have provided an email address to the provincial regulator (n = 5507). Descriptive and regression analyses were performed to explore practice and demographic factors associated with the use of DS/GA.

Results: The response rate was 18.3%. A quarter (24.8%) of respondents reported inadequate access to DS/GA. Access was poorest in rural communities and greatest in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). Overall, 74.5% of dentists indicated that they had used DS/GA in the past 12 months. Use was defined as having provided the service or referred a patient in the past 12 months. Non-use was most likely among general dentists, part-time dentists, dentists > 64 years and dentists in urban locations. Wait times and travel distances were reported as longer for medically complex patients. The most common reasons for non-use of DS/GA were a lack of perceived demand and additional costs to patients. For DS/GA users, the greatest barrier was additional costs to patients.

Conclusion: Access to DS/GA in Ontario is not uniform; it remains a challenge in rural communities and regions outside the GTA, especially in the north. Use is lowest among general dentists and urban dentists despite adequate access, with dentists’ perception of need for DS/GA and cost to the patient acting as major barriers. Education for dentists and better insurance coverage for patients may improve access for these patients.

About 12% of Canadians prefer deep sedation/general anesthesia (DS/GA) as an adjunct to their dental care, with an additional 42.3% interested depending on cost.1 Canadian dental patients have indicated a preference for DS/GA for a wide scope of dental treatments, including routine cleaning (7.2%), restorative dentistry (18%), root canal therapy (54.7%), periodontal surgery (68.2%) and tooth extraction (46.5%).1

Dental fear and anxiety are common reasons why patients prefer DS/GA.2 In Canada, 9.8% of adults are somewhat afraid of dental treatment; an additional 5.5% have a high level of dental fear.1 Dental fear is also well established in children, adolescents, teenagers and people with special needs (28%).3 Dental fear or anxiety leads to dental avoidance in both adults4 and children5; fearful/anxious patients are less likely to seek preventative or regular dental treatment, instead presenting for emergency treatment only when needed.3 Of Canadian adults with a high level of fear, 49.2% reported missing or canceling a dental appointment.1

Pediatric dental rehabilitation is the most common reason for children to have ambulatory hospital day surgery in Canada and accounts for 31% of all hospital day cases nationally. From 2010 to 2014, GA was required in hospital for 57 249 children under 6 years of age treated for dental caries (about 12.1 in 1000).6 Total hospital costs were calculated to be $21.18 million annually.6 As this does not take into account dental rehabilitation under GA performed outside the hospital or children currently on wait lists, it likely represents a fraction of the total numbers and cost.6

Access to DS/GA for dental patients in Ontario has not been formally studied or quantified. Evidence suggests that access is suboptimal, with long wait times reported for both adults and children.7 A Canadian report on children receiving dental GA8 states that the use of less costly and more accessible community-based surgicentres could improve access and decrease wait times for this care. Despite minimal research on the barriers to DS/GA care in dentistry, past research indicates many factors (Table 1). Among these, dentists themselves can be a facilitator or barrier to DS/GA, depending on their ability to determine who would benefit from DS/GA and their own personal and professional experience.9 Research in Canada has found that dentists underestimate patients’ desire for sedation or anesthesia.10,11 Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate Ontario dentists’ use of and perceived access and barriers to DS/GA.

Table 1 Summary of barriers associated with access to deep sedation/general anesthesia from earlier research.
Possible barrier Reference
Additional cost to patients 1, 19
Lack of third-party insurance coverage 19
Inadequate coverage by social assistance programs, i.e., Children in Need of Treatment, Healthy Smiles Ontario, Ontario Disability Support Program, Ontario Works 19, 25, 31
Providing or referring dental anesthesia jeopardizes overall practice profitability 19
Too time consuming or costly to incorporate anesthesia into practice 19
High cost or unavailability of malpractice insurance 19, 31
Sedation and anesthesia do not remunerate well considering their complexity and risk 36
Unnecessary risk to patients 19, 36
Lack of patient or parental acceptance of anesthesia 19, 26, 36
Unnecessary liability or “hassle” in providing anesthesia 19
Rigorous standards of practice for DS/GA 19, 33
No available anesthesia provider in my region 27
Lack of hospital privileges 34
Wait times are too long for anesthesia appointments 9, 21, 22, 30
Lack of anesthesia-related continuing education in my region 17, 19, 28, 36
I did not know anesthesia was available 38
Difficult to identify which patients would benefit from dental anesthesia 16, 36
No need in my patient base 31, 32, 35
Conscious sedation is sufficient and general anesthesia is unnecessary 19

Note: n/a = no comparable data available.
*Source: 2015 registry list of the Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario.34
†Other refers to periodontists, endodontists, prosthodontists, oral medicine/oral pathologists.
‡Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information.35
§Source: 2014 Registry of the Ontario Dental Association.33
¶Source: Baldota and Leake.36

Table 2 Comparison of survey participants with the general population of Ontario dentists based on census data.
Variable All survey
participants, %
(n = 954)
Available Ontario or Canada statistics, %
(n = 9158)*
Effect size
(Cramer’s 
V effect)
p (χ2 test)
PRACTICE CHARACTERISTICS
Registration status     n/a n/a
Active practice 98.7 n/a    
Retired < 12 months ago 1.3 n/a    
Field of practice     0.17 < 0.001
General dentist 80.6 85.8*    
Dental anesthesiologist 2.8 0.4*    
Oral and maxillofacial surgeon 5.6 2.4*    
Pediatric dentist 4.5 1.5*    
Other† 7.3 7.4    
Hours/week     0.05 < 0.001
Part-Time (<32 hours/week) 22.7 17‡    
Full-Time (≥32 hours/week) 77.3 83‡    
Years of practice     0.02 0.02
< 1 3.2 28§    
1–5 12.1    
6–10 9.0    
> 10 75.7 72§    
SOCIAL DEMOGRAPHICS
Age of dentist, years     0.05 < 0.001
< 35 13.0 14§    
35–44 19.8 24§    
45–54 26.8 26§    
55–64 27.9 22§    
> 64 12.5 14§    
Population at location of primary practice     n/a n/a
< 5000 4.0 n/a    
5000–30 000 11.9 n/a    
30 001–100 000 10.7 n/a    
100 001–500 000 31.2 n/a    
> 500 000 41.2 n/a    
Distance to nearest city with pop. > 100 000, km     n/a n/a
< 20 7.1 n/a    
20–50 6.4 n/a    
51–100 6.3 n/a    
> 100 6.4 n/a    
City classification     0.04 < 0.001
Rural 8.5 11¶    
Urban 91.5 89¶    
Region     0.11 < 0.001
Northern Ontario 8.4 4.2§    
Eastern Ontario 15.0 12.0§    
Central Ontario 6.6 10.2§    
Southwestern Ontario 17.5 10.4§    
Hamilton and Niagara 10.2 6.1§    
Greater Toronto Area 42.4 54.9§    
Adequate access to DS/GA 75.2 n/a n/a n/a
USE OF DEEP SEDATION/GENERAL ANESTHESIA (DS/GA)     n/a n/a
Yes 74.5 n/a    
Refers for DS/GA 55.6 n/a    
Provides DS/GA 19.0 n/a    
No 25.5 n/a    

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey of practising Ontario dentists (general practitioners and specialists). Ontario dentists were sent emails on behalf of the authors by the provincial regulator (the Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario) and directed by link to an online interface (Survey GizmoTM, Boulder, Col.) displaying the survey instrument. Similar emails were repeated twice in August and September 2014. Dentists, who did not have an office email address, did not practise dentistry, were retired for more than 1 year or had only an academic or student license in the specialties of orthodontics, dental public health or dental radiology were excluded from the study, as they would have limited reason to use DS/GA regularly.

Survey Instrument

We used previously published and validated frameworks on access to health care12,13 to design a theoretical framework for access to dental anesthesia in Ontario (Fig. 1). The key domains of this framework are: (1) the overriding determinant of access is health care policy and health planning, which directly influence (2) the health care delivery system and (3) the end consumers (the patients). The survey instrument was pilot tested among 15 specialists and 15 general dentists in the faculty of dentistry, University of Toronto, to evaluate and validate the design, the burden on the survey respondent (time needed to respond and level of complexity), the response rate, face validity and the feasibility of the planned data analysis. Follow up was completed with the pilot group to ensure that the questionnaire was clear and easy to complete. After revisions, the survey was finalized on the basis of two principal domains:

  • Domain 1 included questions based on the measurable factors that influence access to dental anesthesia in Ontario focusing on characteristics of the health care delivery system (e.g., access, use, referral patterns and barriers encountered). Access was defined as having the ability to refer patients for any procedures under DS/GA within a reasonable time and distance. Use was defined as having either referred for or provided DS/GA within the past year.
  • Domain 2 included questions that established a dentist’s practice characteristics and social demographic information (e.g., registration status, field of practice, age, years of experience, city population and geographic classification).

Figure 1: A theoretical framework for access to dental anesthesia in Ontario.

Sample Size Calculation

Based on the total base population of about 8700, an expected response rate of 0.5, a sampling error of 0.05, and a Z-statistic of 1.96, the study sample was calculated to be 951. However, to ensure an adequate number of responses for analysis of the data and to ensure maximum generalizability of the results, the survey was distributed to all Ontario dentists with an available email address14 (Fig. 2).

Figure 2: Sample of Ontario practising dentists responding to web-based survey.

Data Analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences software v. 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y.) was used for data analyses. Descriptive analyses of the data were undertaken to summarize the results. The size of Cramer’s V effect was assessed to compare the demographic characteristics of the sample with Ontario-level data. The non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the ranking order of barriers to using DS/GA between DS/GA users and non-users. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore factors associated with non-use of, or inadequate access, long waiting time and traveling distance to, DS/GA. All inferential statistical analyses were 2-tailed and interpreted at the 5% level of significance.

Ethics Approval

This survey was approved by the University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (protocol 30192).

Results

Descriptive Results

We achieved a response rate of 18.3% (Fig. 2). Table 2 presents the demographic characteristics of the survey participants. Most respondents were active practising dentists (98.7%), general practitioners (80.2%), 45–64 years old (54%), with more than 10 years of experience (74.3%), practising full time (76.4%) and in urban centres (91.5%) with a population of > 500 000 (41.2%) or 100 000–500 000 (31.2%). Overall, dentists from all regions of Ontario replied, although 41.8% were from the Greater Toronto Area (GTA).

Provision of DS/GA and Referral Patterns

Community- and hospital-based dental clinics were the primary source of DS/GA referral for most medically healthy patients (85.7%) and medically complex patients (59.3%), respectively. Overall, dentists reported that healthy children and adults had to wait less time (only 27.0% and 22.4%, respectively, had to wait > 3 months) and travel shorter distances (only 16.4% and 17.7%, respectively, had to travel > 50 km) than medically compromised patients. In contrast, dentists reported wait times > 3 months for almost half of pediatric and adult medically complex patients (48.3% and 43.5%, respectively). Similarly, travel > 50 km was necessary among 25.7% and 24.5% of these populations, respectively.

Use of and Access to DS/GA

Of the responding dentists, ≥ 75% reported adequate access to and use of DS/GA, i.e., they either referred for DS/GA within the past year (55.6%) or offered the service in their office (19.0%). Access and use by region are mapped in Fig. 3.

Figure 3: Access to (A) and use of (B) deep sedation/general anesthesia by region in Ontario.

 

Note: Access was reported highest in the GTA (89.4%) and lowest in northern Ontario (34.2%). In contrast, rate of use was reported highest in northern Ontario (82.3%) and lowest in the GTA (69.4%).

Access was reported highest in the GTA (89.4%) and lowest in northern Ontario (34.2%). Access was poorest for dentists in rural towns (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–3.2). Compared with dentists in the GTA, those from Hamilton and Niagara (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7–5.2), eastern Ontario (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7–4.7), central Ontario (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.9–6.8), southwestern Ontario (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.4–6.1) and northern Ontario (OR 14.4, 95% CI 7.9–26.1) were more likely to have lower access.

Use was reported highest in northern Ontario (82.3%) and lowest in the GTA (69.4%). DS/GA non-users were most likely to be general dentists (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4–3.3); in part-time practice (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.6–3.3); > 64 years (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2–3.8); and practising in an urban centre (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.0–4.1) (Table 3).

Predictors of Wait Times and Travel Distances for DS/GA

Referral to dental anesthesiologists or oral and maxillofacial surgeons was associated with shorter wait times (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.8–3.5) but further travel distances (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3–2.5), compared with bringing in a traveling anesthesiologist (Table 4). Medically complex patients had higher odds of both longer wait times and travel distances for DS/GA care. Compared with healthy children, medically complex children were twice as likely to experience a wait time > 3 months (OR 2.5, 95% CI 2.0–3.2), as were medically complex adults (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.7–2.7) (Table 4).

Table 3 Survey respondents’ use of and access to deep sedation/general anesthesia (DS/GA) based on various practice characteristics and social demographics.
Variable Non-use of DS/GA, OR (95% CI) Inadequate access to DS/GA, OR (95% CI)
Unadjusted bivariate p Multivariate adjusted p Unadjusted bivariate p Multivariate adjusted p
Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.
PRACTICE CHARACTERISTICS
Field of practice                
General dentist 1.79 (1.19–2.69) 0.005 2.1 (1.4–3.3) 0.001 Reference
Specialist Reference 1.12 (0.77–1.61) 0.561 1.38 (0.91–2.09) 0.132
Hours/week                
Part time 2.5 (1.8–3.4) < 0.001 2.3 (1.6–3.3) < 0.001 0.9 (0.6–1.3) 0.453 1.1 (0.7–1.6) 0.744
Full time Reference Reference
Years in practice                
≤ 10 1.0 (0.7–1.5) 0.818 Excluded, correlated with age 1.2 (0.8–1.6) 0.392 Excluded, correlated with age
> 10 Reference Reference
SOCIAL DEMOGRAPHICS
Age, years                
< 35 Reference Reference
35–44 1.1 (0.7–1.9) 0.634 1.2 (0.7–2.1) 0.459 0.8 (0.5–1.4) 0.429 0.9 (0.5–1.5) 0.645
45–54 0.9 (0.5–1.5) 0.623 1.0 (0.6–1.6) 0.885 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 0.425 0.9 (0.5–1.5) 0.602
55–64 1.1 (0.7–1.9) 0.619 1.2 (0.7–2.0) 0.516 0.7 (0.4–1.1) 0.108 0.6 (0.4–1.1) 0.097
> 64 2.3 (1.3–4.1) 0.003 2.1 (1.2–3.8) 0.014 0.7 (0.4–1.2) 0.214 0.6 (0.3–1.2) 0.165
Population at location of primary practice                
< 30 000 Reference Excluded, correlated urban or rural city classification 4.2 (2.7–6.4) < 0.001 Excluded, correlated urban or rural city classification
30 001–100 000 1.3 (0.6–2.5) 0.497 2.2 (1.3–3.7) 0.003
100 001–500 000 2.2 (1.3–3.8) 0.002 2.6 (1.8–3.8) < 0.001
> 500 000 2.6 (1.6–4.2) < 0.001 Reference
Distance to nearest city > 100 000                
< 50 km 1.9 (0.7–4.9) 0.195 Excluded, correlated urban or rural city classification Reference Excluded, correlated urban or rural city classification
50–100 km 2.1 (0.7–6.0) 0.185 2.5 (1.3–4.8) 0.006
> 100 km Reference 3.6 (1.9–6.9) < 0.001
City classification                
Rural Reference 3.6 (2.2–5.6) < 0.001 1.9 (1.1–3.2) 0.017
Urban 2.1 (1.1–3.9) 0.024 2.1 (1.0–4.1) 0.039 Reference
Region                
Northern Ontario Reference 16.2 (9.2–28.5) < 0.001 14.4 (7.9–26.1) < 0.001
Eastern Ontario 2.0 (1.0–3.9) 0.051 1.6 (0.8–3.3) 0.184 3.1 (1.9–5.1) < 0.001 2.9 (1.7–4.7) < 0.001
Central Ontario 1.1 (0.5–2.6) 0.804 0.8 (0.3–2.0) 0.704 4.0 (2.2–7.5) < 0.001 3.5 (1.9–6.8) < 0.001
Southwestern Ontario 1.0 (0.5–2.1) 0.930 0.8 (0.4–1.7) 0.573 4.3 (2.7–6.7) < 0.001 3.8 (2.4–6.1) < 0.001
Hamilton & Niagara 1.1 (0.5–2.3) 0.861 0.8 (0.3–1.8) 0.568 2.8 (1.6–5.0) < 0.001 2.9 (1.7–5.2) < 0.001
Greater Toronto Area 2.0 (1.1–3.8) 0.023 1.5 (0.8–2.9) 0.216 Reference
Table 4 Odds of long wait times and long travel distances to obtain deep sedation/general anesthesia (DS/GA) related to survey respondents’ field of practice and patient health characteristics according to providers.
Variable Wait time for DS/GA appointment
> 3 months
Distance to dental anesthesia provider > 50 km
Unadjusted bivariate
OR (95% CI)
p Unadjusted bivariate
OR (95% CI)
p
*Other refers to periodontists, endodontists, prosthodontists, oral medicine/oral pathologists. †American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification system.15 Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.
FIELD OF PRACTICE
Anesthesia specialty practice (dental anesthesia or oral and maxillofacial surgery) Reference 1.7 (1.3–2.5) 0.001
General dentistry, pediatric dentist, or other dental office* 2.5 (1.8–3.5) < 0.001 Reference
PATIENT HEALTH CLASSIFICATION
Pediatric healthy (ASA I or II)† Reference Reference
Pediatric medically complex (ASA III or IV)† 2.5 (2.0–3.2) < 0.001 1.6 (1.2–2.1) 0.001
Adult healthy (ASA I or II)† 0.9 (0.7–1.1) 0.252 1.1 (0.8–1.5) 0.446
Adult medically complex (ASA III or IV)† 2.1 (1.7–2.7) < 0.001 1.6 (1.2–2.1) 0.002

Perceived Barriers to Access to DS/GA

Dentists who used DS/GA reported the following barriers as the most important: additional cost to patients (66.2%), inadequate coverage by social assistance programs (56.8%) and lack of third-party insurance coverage (47.9%). Conversely, the most important reasons reported by dentists who did not use DS/GA were: no need in their patient base (68.3%) and sufficiency of conscious sedation (45.3%). The difference between DS/GA users and non-users in ranking the importance of barriers was significant (p < 0.001). Overall, 26.1% of responding dentists reported that they had inadequate access to anesthesia-related continuing dental education (CDE) (Table 5); 73.3% of them believed that such CDE would help them better care for their patients (data not shown).

Table 5 Frequency of barriers to the use of and access to deep sedation/general anesthesia (DS/GA) reported by users and non-users of these treatments.
Barrier or limitation Users of DS/GA in past 12 months Rank Non-users of DS/GA in past 12 months
(n = 243), %
Rank All respondents
(n = 954), %
p (difference between yes and no groups) Rank difference
Provides DS/GA
(n = 181), %
Refers for DS/GA
(n = 530), %
Total
(n = 711), %
Note: n/a = not applicable.
BARRIERS THAT HINDER DENTIST’S ABILITY TO USE DS/GA
Additional cost to patients 60.8 67.9 66.2 1 28.0 3 56.4 < 0.001 2
Inadequate coverage from social assistance programs, i.e. , Children in Need of Treatment, Healthy Smiles Ontario, Ontario Disability Support Program, Ontario Works 51.9 58.3 56.8 2 16.5 5 46.4 < 0.001 3
Lack of third-party insurance coverage 49.7 47.2 47.9 3 11.9 7 38.7 < 0.001 4
Lack of patient/parental acceptance 19.9 26.4 24.8 4 6.6 12 20.1 < 0.001 8
Too time consuming/costly to incorporate sedation into my practice 2.7 30.9 23.8 5 12.3 6 20.9 < 0.001 1
Lack of hospital privileges in my city/town 19.3 22.5 21.7 6 6.2 13 17.7 < 0.001 7
Unnecessary liability or “hassle” of providing anesthesia 4.4 24.9 19.7 7 11.9 7 17.7 0.006 0
Wait times are too long for anesthesia appointments 13.3 17.2 16.2 8 8.2 11 14.2 0.002 3
Unnecessary risk to patients 8.3 18.1 15.6 9 18.1 4 16.2 0.363 5
Rigorous standards of practice for DS/GA 4.4 17.2 13.9 10 8.6 10 12.6 0.032 0
Sedation and anesthesia do not remunerate well considering their complexity and risk 7.7 10.6 9.9 11 3.7 16 8.3 0.003 5
No available anesthesia provider in my region 1.7 10.4 8.2 12 9.1 9 8.4 0.664 3
Lack of anesthesia-related continuing education in my region 1.7 7.9 6.3 13 5.3 14 6.1 0.581 1
High cost or lack of additional malpractice insurance 2.7 6.2 5.4 14 4.1 15 5.0 0.449 1
Difficult to identify which patients would benefit from dental anesthesia 1.1 4.9 3.9 15   2.9 n/a n/a
Providing/referring for DS/GA jeopardizes overall practice profitability 0.5 3.6 2.8 16 1.6 17 2.5 0.316 1
I didn’t know DS/GA was available 0.0 0.9 0.7 17 1.6 17 0.9 0.189 0
Conscious sedation is sufficient   45.3 2 11.5 n/a 16
No need in my patient base 68.3 1 17.4 n/a 17
ACCESS TO CARE
Adequate access to DS/GA 79.3 70.8 72.9   81.8   705 0.023  
Inadequate access to DS/GA 20.7 29.2 27.1 18.2   233 0.005
Access to continuing education related to DS/GA 73.3 72.0 72.3 78.5   688 0.075
Inadequate access to continuing education related to DS/GA 26.7 28.0 27.7 21.5   243 0.063

Discussion

Dentists’ views of the need for DS/GA are an underlying construct that acts as a barrier to the use of DS/GA for Ontario dental patients. Moreover, dentists report that the additional cost of DS/GA limits use of the service despite patient demand and its availability.

Referral Patterns, Access to and Use of DS/GA

In Ontario, only dental anesthesiologists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and medical anesthesiologists can provide DS/GA in dental offices. In general, dental anesthesiologists provide this service mainly in community-based clinics, whereas medical anesthesiologists work in hospitals and private clinics. We found that most referrals for DS/GA (78%) are made by general dentists, supporting the notion that they influence a patient’s ability to obtain DS/GA. Because 25.5% of dentists never use DS/GA, it appears that not all patients who would benefit from DS/GA are being offered this treatment.

Most medically healthy patients (85.7%) are referred to community-based dental offices, while medically compromised patients (59.3%) are more often referred for hospital-based anesthesia, suggesting that dentists use hospital operating rooms appropriately. This is important considering that dental operating room privileges are declining16 and wait times for hospital dental departments are reported to exceed 12 months.17,18 Furthermore, nearly a fifth of all dentists surveyed indicated that they offer DS/GA in their offices, thereby contributing significantly to the total provision of DS/GA.

In our sample, the 2 main predictors of inadequate access to DS/GA were rural location and practising outside the GTA. In general, in rural areas (particularly northern Ontario), the density and availability of dental/medical anesthesia specialists, as well as hospitals accepting dental referrals, is lower16 than in major urban centres.19,20 Moreover, lack of access to anesthesia-related CDE courses, especially in northern Ontario, can be an important barrier to use of DS/GA.21 Increasing access to CDE would enable dentists to better understand anesthesia options, patient screening and selection; most dentists sampled also believed it would allow them to provide better care for their patients. This may be of interest to dental educators as well as the Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario in terms of CDE standards and recertification of Ontario dentists.

Use of DS/GA was inversely related to access, with the lowest use reported in the GTA and highest in northern Ontario. The reasons for non-use are likely multifactorial but non-use was greater for general dentists, part-time dentists, dentists > 64 years of age and dentists who practise in an urban location. A variation in dentists’ attitudes toward DS/GA could explain lower use. Part-time dentists are known to have unique practice patterns22 and older dentists more often work in rural settings, which may confound results.23

Urban dentists might have unique practice profiles, influenced in part by the ratio of dentists to patients in urban areas such as the GTA (1:1053) versus rural areas such as northern Ontario (1:7500).24 Patient density might influence how busy a dentist is, time available per patient, emphasis on prevention, invasiveness of dentistry required, availability of local specialists and economic pressures that affect referral patterns.

Travel Distance and Wait Times

In Ontario, barriers such as wait times and travel distances are most likely to hinder access to dental care, especially for vulnerable populations.25 We found that patients who are referred for DS/GA provided by an itinerant anesthesiologist — rather than an office-based dental anesthesiologist or oral and maxillofacial surgeon — are 2.5 times more likely to experience a longer wait time (> 3 months). However, patients are also more likely to travel farther (> 50 km) to the office of a dental anesthesiologist or oral and maxillofacial surgeons, as few specialty dental anesthesia offices for comprehensive dentistry exist. The longer wait times and travel distances associated with medically complex patients could be related to the need for hospital operating rooms, as our results showed that these patients were more likely to be referred to hospitals, which are known to have longer wait times.16,17,26

Barriers to DS/GA

DS/GA users indicated that the most important barrier related to patients was the cost of DS/GA services and the lack of private or public insurance coverage to fund DS/GA treatment, as corroborated previously.1 The second highest ranked barrier perceived by this group was lack of patient/parental acceptance. This finding is contrary to past research reporting that, in the 20 years from 1984 to 2004, parents preferred DS/GA to aggressive restraint techniques.27 The third highest ranked barrier was the perceived cost to the provider (i.e., establishing and maintaining an anesthesia practice, as well as indirect costs associated with dedicated DS/GA treatment days).28,29 Overall, these barriers relate mainly to the financial burden of DS/GA, not dentists’ lack of faith in DS/GA as a treatment modality, as few dentists who use DS/GA cited risk as a barrier.

In comparison, DS/GA non-users overwhelmingly believed that this treatment added cost to the patients and was not needed or requested in their practice, although they did not perceive the service to be more risky than other dentists. The underestimation of patient need has been previously demonstrated among both Ontario and Manitoba dentists.10,11 With an increasing demand for sedation and anesthesia in dentistry in Canada,1 dentists’ attitudes toward DS/GA seem to be influencing its use. Non-users ranked barriers to DS/GA differently than users, demonstrating a difference in attitude toward DS/GA between the 2 groups (Table 5). This difference was significant based on the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Limitations and Implications

Our response rate of 18.3% was within the range of 14–30% reported in other recent surveys of dentists in Ontario,14,30,31 and the achieved sample of 954 participants matched our a priori calculated sample size of 951. It must be noted that a survey’s response rate is at best an indirect indication of the extent of non-response bias, and attention should be devoted to assessments of potential bias.32 In this regard, the participants’ demographic characteristics were comparable to those of all dentists based on available census data from Ontario33,34 and Canada35,36 (Table 2). That said, the interpretation of results must also be done with caution, as access, use and barriers were based on dentists’ perceptions and not patient experience. Furthermore, we are currently exploring Ontario dental patients’ perceptions of use of and access and barriers to DS/GA.

Similar to other research in Ontario,10,11 our results suggest that dentists’ attitudes and preferences are a major barrier to the use of DS/GA. Furthermore, in Ontario, there are currently no guidelines for when to refer for or use DS/GA, and use partly depends on the discretion and clinical judgement of the individual dentist. Educational opportunities for dentists in undergraduate training or CDE courses, provided online to allow access in remote areas, could improve their understanding of the risks, benefits and alternatives of dental care under DS/GA and facilitate more collaborative decision-making with patients, as well as a high standard of informed consent.

As costs to patients appear to be the major barrier, these results must be communicated to private and public dental insurance providers, who should consider DS/GA an essential service in dentistry. With a significant amount of DS/GA occurring outside hospitals, cost and access information can benefit the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and local administrators, especially as previous research has demonstrated that the total cost of DS/GA care in community-based clinics is much less than in hospital operating rooms.29,37

THE AUTHORS

 
 

Dr. Adams is a dental anesthesiologist and an associate in dentistry, faculty of dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

Dr. Yarascavitch is a dental anesthesiologist, an assistant professor, and graduate program director in dental anaesthesia, faculty of dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

Dr. Quiñonez is a dental public health specialist, associate professor, and graduate program director in dental public health, faculty of dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

Dr. Azarpazhooh is an endodontist and dental public health specialist, associate professor, faculty of dentistry, University of Toronto; and the head of endodontics and research, department of dentistry, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario.

Correspondence to: Dr. Amir Azarpazhooh, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, 710F-481 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G2P1, Canada. Email: amir.azarpazhooh@dentistry.utoronto.ca

Acknowledgement: This study was funded by the American Society of Dental Anesthesiologists Education and Research Fund. The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Daniel Haas, Rose Abate, Irwin Fefergrad, Peggi Mace, Angelo Avecillas, Diana Rickford, and Nima Laghapour LIghvan for their support throughout this project. Dr. Adams won an award for presenting this research at the 2015 University of Toronto Research Day.

The authors have no declared financial interests.

This article has been peer reviewed.

References

  1. Chanpong B, Haas DA, Locker D. Need and demand for sedation or general anesthesia in dentistry: a national survey of the Canadian population. Anesth Prog. 2005;52(1):3-11.
  2. Boyle CA, Newton T, Milgrom P. Who is referred for sedation for dentistry and why? Br Dent J. 2009;206(6):E12; discussion 322-3.
  3. Gatchel RJ. The prevalence of dental fear and avoidance: expanded adult and recent adolescent surveys. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989;118(5):591-3.
  4. Baker RA, Farrer S, Perkins VJ, Sanders H. Emergency dental clinic patients in South Devon, their anxiety levels, expressed demand for treatment under sedation and suitability for management under sedation. Prim Dent Care. 2006;13(1):11-8.
  5. Milsom KM, Tickle M, Humphris GM, Blinkhorn AS. The relationship between anxiety and dental treatment experience in 5-year-old children. Br Dent J. 2003;194(9):503-6; discussion 495.
  6. Schroth RJ, Quiñonez C, Shwart L, Wagar B. Treating early childhood caries under general anesthesia: a national review of Canadian data. J Can Dent Assoc. 2016;82:g20.
  7. Weeks C. Thousands of children facing unacceptable wait times for surgery. The Globe and Mail [Internet] 2010; Jun. 17 [updated 2010 Jun. 18; accessed 2016 Mar. 2]. Available from: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/thousands-of-children-facin...
  8. Mathu KR, Bush HM, Li HF, Nam L. British Columbia Children’s hospital: 3 year summary of children receiving dental treatment with the use of general anesthesia. Vancouver: British Columbia Dental Association; 2013.
  9. Johnson C, Weber-Gasparoni K, Slayton RL, Qian F. Conscious sedation attitudes and perceptions: a survey of American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry members. Pediatr Dent. 2012;34(2):132-7.
  10. Patodia S. Dentists’ views and practice of sedation and general anaesthesia in Ontario [thesis]. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2013 [accessed 2016 Mar. 2]. Available from: https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/43289
  11. Campbell J. Dental sedation and general anaesthesia in Manitoba: a survey of need, demand, and perceptions [thesis]. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2015.
  12. Aday LA, Andersen RM. Equity of access to medical care: a conceptual and empirical overview. Med Care. 1981;19(12 Suppl):4-27.
  13. Khan AA, Bhardwaj SM. Access to health care. A conceptual framework and its relevance to health care planning. Eval Health Prof. 1994;17(1):60-76.
  14. Azarpazhooh A, Dao T, Figueiredo R, Krahn M, Friedman S. A survey of dentists’ preferences for the treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod. 2013;39(10):1226-33.
  15. ASA physical status classification system. Schaumburg, Ill.: American Society of Anesthesiologists; 2014. https://www.asahq.org/resources/clinical-information/asa-physical-status-classification-system
  16. Baird A, Abate R. Hospital restructuring, downsizing and cutbacks - the impact on hospital-based dentistry. Ont Dent. 2000:23-31.
  17. Winston I. Dental care for people with special needs. National Post 2011;Feb.22:AL8.
  18. Rowan-Legg A, Canadian Paediatric Society, Community Paediatrics Committee. Oral health care for children – a call for action. Paediatr Child Health. 2013;18(1):37-50.
  19. Pitblado JR, Pong RW. Geographic distribution of physicians in Canada. Sudbury, Ont.: Centre for Rural and Northern Health Research, Laurentian University; 1999. Available from: http://documents.cranhr.ca/pdf/distrib/GEOREPORT.pdf
  20. Meyer SP. A spatial assessment of dentist supply in Ontario, Canada. Can Geogr. 58(4):481-98 [cited 2015 Jan 8]. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/cag.12103.
  21. Curran VR, Fleet L, Kirby F. Factors influencing rural health care professionals’ access to continuing professional education. Aust J Rural Health. 2006;14(2):51-5.
  22. Gilbert GH, Gordan VV, Korelitz JJ, Fellows JL, Meyerowitz C, Oates TW, et al. Provision of specific dental procedures by general dentists in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network: questionnaire findings. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:11.
  23. McKernan SC, Kuthy RA, Kavand G. General dentist characteristics associated with rural practice location. J Rural Health. 2013;29(Suppl 1):s89-95.
  24. Population per dentist by Ontario county. Toronto: Ontario Dental Association; 2013.
  25. Koneru A. Access to dental care for persons with disabilities in Ontario: a focus on persons with developmental disabilities [thesis]. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2009. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/17190
  26. Park MS, Sigal MJ. The role of hospital-based dentistry in providing treatment for persons with developmental delay. J Can Dent Assoc. 2008;74(4):353-7.
  27. Eaton JJ, McTigue DJ, Fields HW Jr, Beck M. Attitudes of contemporary parents toward behavior management techniques used in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27(2):107-13.
  28. Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario. Standard of practice. Use of sedation and general anesthesia in dental practice. Toronto: Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario; 2012, rev. April 2015.
  29. Rashewsky S, Parameswaran A, Sloane C, Ferguson F, Epstein R. Time and cost analysis: pediatric dental rehabilitation with general anesthesia in the office and the hospital settings. Anesth Prog. 2012;59(4):147-53.
  30. Alhussain A. Knowledge, practices and opinions of Ontario dentists when treating patients receiving bisphosphonates [thesis]. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2013 [cited 2016 Mar 2]. Available from: https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/42668
  31. Chvartszaid D. A survey regarding the nature and type of dental implant complications in private practices in the province of Ontario [thesis]. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2011 [cited 2016 Mar 2]. Available from: https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/27333
  32. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(10):1129-36.
  33. Registry of the Ontario Dental Association. Toronto: Ontario Dental Association; 2014.
  34. Number of general dentists & specialists in Ontario. Toronto: Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario; 2015 Jan 30.
  35. Canada’s health care providers, 1997-2011 - A reference guide. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2013.
  36. Baldota KK, Leake JL. A macroeconomic review of dentistry in Canada in the 1990s. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004;70(9):604-9.
  37. Lalwani K, Kitchin J, Lax P. Office-based dental rehabilitation in children with special healthcare needs using a pediatric sedation service model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(3):427-33.
  38. Hastings GB, Lawther S, Eadie DR, Haywood A, Lowry R, Evans D. General anaesthesia: who decides, and why? Br Dent J. 1994;177(9):332–34.

Add new comment